All I know from all of this is:
Apparently Gazza, has issues about wether hacking software is illegal, and or unethical and is attempting to argue same here as a proxy for someone else. My first thought is, isn't he lucky that there is a place like The Swamp where the moderators do not possess a god complex and haven't already deleted this dribble and locked his account. My second thought is he would do well to learn to formulate a coherent line of questions and dialog, if he wishes to further a cause; as his debate skills are sorely lacking and has probably done more to hurt his cause than to advance it.
Sure the EULA for most software is written to protect the publisher from illegal distribution, reverse engineering, and or unlocking functions NOT in the version one purchased. That being the case, the fact that some application might unlock these features does not make it legal or ethical to do so. If he wants to argue that Autodesk is unfair in limiting a programmers ability to make money off of unlocking, or providing access to functions that are locked or limited by the LICENSED version the purchaser purchased, he has not convinced me that they are, or that the application he is touting is either legal or ethical. Would be nice if for all his energy that one person could agree with him. Perhaps his future posts will contain more coherent discussions, or information that might prove to have some value to the members at large.
