0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: StykFacE on April 25, 2012, 04:30:44 PMI don't see STB's as much of a draw back to be honest when compared to CTB's. The only drawback would be if someone decided to get all crazy and name each style in pig latin or something. Keeping a good naming convention for each Lineweight is the best protocol. Or even if you use the "Extra Bold, Bold, Medium, Thin, Extra Thin" naming convention then that works too. Thats how we name ours Extraway OldbayOldbayEdiummayInthayExtraway Inthay
I don't see STB's as much of a draw back to be honest when compared to CTB's. The only drawback would be if someone decided to get all crazy and name each style in pig latin or something. Keeping a good naming convention for each Lineweight is the best protocol. Or even if you use the "Extra Bold, Bold, Medium, Thin, Extra Thin" naming convention then that works too.
Quote from: Jeff H on April 25, 2012, 04:39:57 PMQuote from: StykFacE on April 25, 2012, 04:30:44 PMI don't see STB's as much of a draw back to be honest when compared to CTB's. The only drawback would be if someone decided to get all crazy and name each style in pig latin or something. Keeping a good naming convention for each Lineweight is the best protocol. Or even if you use the "Extra Bold, Bold, Medium, Thin, Extra Thin" naming convention then that works too. Thats how we name ours Extraway OldbayOldbayEdiummayInthayExtraway InthayOuyay on'tday avehay away airhay onway ouryay assway. Atthay ouldway ebay ootay unnyfay!!
Do any of you perfer screening and/or using thinner lineweights to accent different objects? For exampleNew objects = 0.35 - 0.5Existing objects = 0.15 - 0.25 orNew objects = 0.35 - 0.5Existing objects = 0.35 - 0.5 @ 75% screening
