@ MP
it wasn't my intention to disregard the swamp in any way.... !!!
In my last 2 questions on the swamp, LM replied immediately with a link to his site, so when I said to look on his site first, was like a joke/compliment
Sorry I failed to read it that way and for the ensuing tangent, oh well.
I completely agree with you MP -
I knew you would and why I had no reservation posting my comment.
Firstly, given the tremendous length of time that AutoLISP has been around (~ 27 years) it is almost guaranteed that every task or programming puzzle has already been solved by someone else - it would be very rare to write something entirely original in AutoLISP.
Somewhat agree, though I'm not suggesting for a minute existing solutions shouldn't be challenged, refined, or completely rewritten. The body of knowledge should always be growing, evolving, improving -- not static.
... the community will only continue to benefit from information & knowledge that is shared.
<ding> <ding>
You <Lee> yourself post lots of original thinking AutoLISP routines.
Fully agree. New thinking should be encouraged, fostered, shared -- that's what the swamp is about.