Author Topic: Acroplot on 2013 or 14  (Read 4973 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

danallen

  • Guest
Acroplot on 2013 or 14
« on: July 01, 2013, 08:29:00 PM »
We're looking at upgrading from ancient 2005 to 2014 and putting a budget together. We use Acroplot to batch print projects, and for the better quality than straight to Adobe PDF driver provides. Is this still necessary in the newer versions of AutoCAD?

Dan

Rob...

  • King Gator
  • Posts: 3824
  • Take a little time to stop and smell the roses.
Re: Acroplot on 2013 or 14
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2013, 06:37:21 AM »
The newer DWG to PDF driver included in AutoCAD, while not perfect, is much better. A bonus is that layer information can be included and they can be turned on and off.
CAD Tech

Krushert

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 13679
  • FREE BEER Tomorrow!!
Re: Acroplot on 2013 or 14
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2013, 07:02:10 AM »
And the new publish command (not sure when it was added) is very strong on its own or if utilized thru the sheet set manager it is the insanely powerful.  The publish command can create PDFs or plot to your plotters.

And the dwg to pdf driver has come a long way.  I use it exclusively.
I + XI = X is true ...  ... if you change your perspective.

I no longer CAD or Model, I just hang out here picking up the empties beer cans

Johnvictor

  • Guest
Re: Acroplot on 2013 or 14
« Reply #3 on: October 16, 2013, 10:58:14 AM »
Hi danallen,
See primarily it helps to reduce the TAT by almost 60% by using acroplot. I suggest you should use it for better accuracy as well. AutoCAD 2014 still does not have features like acroplot.

Rob...

  • King Gator
  • Posts: 3824
  • Take a little time to stop and smell the roses.
Re: Acroplot on 2013 or 14
« Reply #4 on: October 16, 2013, 11:13:28 AM »
Hi danallen,
See primarily it helps to reduce the TAT by almost 60% by using acroplot. I suggest you should use it for better accuracy as well. AutoCAD 2014 still does not have features like acroplot.

Can you please provide some more details?
What is "TAT"?
How is it more accurate?
What features are you referring to?

Having this information will help in making an informed decision rather than just Johnvictor said so.
CAD Tech

Matt__W

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 12955
  • I like my water diluted.
Re: Acroplot on 2013 or 14
« Reply #5 on: October 16, 2013, 12:03:40 PM »
Hi danallen,
See primarily it helps to reduce the TAT by almost 60% by using acroplot. I suggest you should use it for better accuracy as well. AutoCAD 2014 still does not have features like acroplot.

Can you please provide some more details?
What is "TAT"?
Totally Awesome Trip, duh!
Autodesk Expert Elite
Revit Subject Matter Expert (SME)
Owner/FAA sUAS Pilot @ http://skyviz.io

rkmcswain

  • Swamp Rat
  • Posts: 978
Re: Acroplot on 2013 or 14
« Reply #6 on: October 16, 2013, 01:22:31 PM »
We're looking at upgrading from ancient 2005 to 2014 and putting a budget together. We use Acroplot to batch print projects, and for the better quality than straight to Adobe PDF driver provides. Is this still necessary in the newer versions of AutoCAD?

Dan

We used Acroplot until Autodesk got it together and fixed the DWG to PDF driver (±AutoCAD 2009 version) and since then we use the built in driver exclusively.
It's SO MUCH easier to not have to deal with a 3rd party app now.


danallen

  • Guest
Re: Acroplot on 2013 or 14
« Reply #7 on: October 16, 2013, 10:45:30 PM »
We went to Bricscad instead of AutoCAD 2014, so unfortunately have to find a different batch plot option since Acroplot is only for acad. I intend to look at Se7en's ghostscript method