Author Topic: "Standard" sheet names/numbers  (Read 4704 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Matt__W

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 12955
  • I like my water diluted.
"Standard" sheet names/numbers
« on: October 07, 2008, 01:07:57 PM »
This is for all you archies/interior designers of the Swamp...

I'm doing some architectural plans of our existing building and I'd like to know what the "standard" is for sheet names and numbering.

I.E....
A-101  FIRST FLOOR PLAN
A-102  FIRST FLOOR PART PLAN
F-101  FIRST FLOOR FURNITURE PLAN

Can anyone point me in the right direction or post a sample of your company's standard?

Thanks.
Autodesk Expert Elite
Revit Subject Matter Expert (SME)
Owner/FAA sUAS Pilot @ http://skyviz.io

dtkell

  • Bull Frog
  • Posts: 214
Re: "Standard" sheet names/numbers
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2008, 05:29:57 PM »
You could use the National CAD Standard naming convention as available from https://cadbim.usace.army.mil/default.aspx?p=s&t=13&i=4.
Attached is section for numbering.
Hope it helps.

Incidentally, not architecture or interior oriented.
\"What sane person could live in this world and not be crazy?\" -Ursula K. Le Guin

Matt__W

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 12955
  • I like my water diluted.
Re: "Standard" sheet names/numbers
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2008, 08:33:29 AM »
Cool.  Thanks.
Autodesk Expert Elite
Revit Subject Matter Expert (SME)
Owner/FAA sUAS Pilot @ http://skyviz.io

Krushert

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 13608
  • FREE BEER Tomorrow!!
Re: "Standard" sheet names/numbers
« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2008, 08:35:25 AM »
Our way is in transition from being screwed up to a little less screwed up.  So I will just see what others post.   I can tell you this we are not going to NCS.  A little too cumbersome and complicated.  Typical like the Military.
I + XI = X is true ...  ... if you change your perspective.

I no longer CAD or Model, I just hang out here for camaraderie

Alan Cullen

  • Guest
Re: "Standard" sheet names/numbers
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2008, 08:49:53 AM »
Hey......settle down a bit there, Krushert....

"Typical like the Military."

They only upset me once...I happen to still have a soft spot for them.......yeah they can be silly.....sometimes......okay most times...oh all right, pretty well all the bloody time.

But I still have a soft spot for them....after all, I was one once.  :lol:

Krushert

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 13608
  • FREE BEER Tomorrow!!
Re: "Standard" sheet names/numbers
« Reply #5 on: October 08, 2008, 09:26:14 AM »
Hey......settle down a bit there, Krushert....

"Typical like the Military."

They only upset me once...I happen to still have a soft spot for them.......yeah they can be silly.....sometimes......okay most times...oh all right, pretty well all the bloody time.

But I still have a soft spot for them....after all, I was one once.  :lol:
I have a soft spot for them too but it doesn't mean that we civilians have to adopt military protocol and procedures and process for civilian applications.  Just my opinion that is about worth a 1/2 cent.  :-)
I + XI = X is true ...  ... if you change your perspective.

I no longer CAD or Model, I just hang out here for camaraderie

Alan Cullen

  • Guest
Re: "Standard" sheet names/numbers
« Reply #6 on: October 08, 2008, 09:33:38 AM »
hehehe...I totally understand.....

I never could figure out the military thought process......

Matt__W

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 12955
  • I like my water diluted.
Re: "Standard" sheet names/numbers
« Reply #7 on: October 08, 2008, 11:05:56 AM »
Another question... What is the "typical" order for architectural sheets?

I.E floor plans first, then rcp's?, then interiors?
Autodesk Expert Elite
Revit Subject Matter Expert (SME)
Owner/FAA sUAS Pilot @ http://skyviz.io

mjfarrell

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 14444
  • Every Student their own Lesson
Re: "Standard" sheet names/numbers
« Reply #8 on: October 08, 2008, 11:11:03 AM »
the National CAD Standard

Which is neither national, nor the standard.....
Be your Best


Michael Farrell
http://primeservicesglobal.com/

Bob Wahr

  • Guest
Re: "Standard" sheet names/numbers
« Reply #9 on: October 08, 2008, 11:19:38 AM »
You could use the National CAD Standard naming convention as available from https://cadbim.usace.army.mil/default.aspx?p=s&t=13&i=4.
Attached is section for numbering.
Hope it helps.

Incidentally, not architecture or interior oriented.
FWIW, AECC standard is what the NCS was initially based off of, and AECC is NCS compliant (go figure), but that link is not the NCS.

dtkell

  • Bull Frog
  • Posts: 214
Re: "Standard" sheet names/numbers
« Reply #10 on: October 08, 2008, 12:45:52 PM »
You could use the National CAD Standard naming convention as available from...

FWIW, AECC standard is what the NCS was initially based off of, and AECC is NCS compliant (go figure), but that link is not the NCS.

I realize that it is not the NCS.
I thought it was clear that the naming convention was per the NCS available from the AECC (the link) seeing that the NCS costs $ and AECC is free.
\"What sane person could live in this world and not be crazy?\" -Ursula K. Le Guin