Author Topic: Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards  (Read 14700 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

M-dub

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« on: August 11, 2004, 03:08:38 PM »
Hey All,
We've got thousands of drawings that go back to '65 for the manual drawings and electronic drawings that go back to about '82 - '83.  They've been drawn or worked on by hundreds of different people, under many different supervisors, for many different companies.  Beginning to get a picture here?

My scenario is this:
A company has a set of standards.  For a few years, those standards are followed, until the CAD Supervisor gets 'replaced', etc.  At which time, the standards mysteriously change as well.  Now you've got draftsmen who are used to 'The Old' way of doing things and a new standard.  This trend continues for FOUR DECADES (or is that three?  Anyway...).  What we're left with is a virtual kaleidoscope of CAD drawings ranging from 100% correct and in accordance to the Standard (of the day) to drawings that are barely recognizable AS drawings.  I would say most of the drawings here are of the 'Baskin Robbins' standard...(31 different flavours).

Of course, Layers are only one tiny little aspect of standards, but it's like the pea under the mattress that got me to get up and post this topic.  I'm in a drawing where everything is on Layer 0 and Layer 1.  Nice  8)  (Note the sarcasm).  I find myself 'on the fence' with this subject because half of me wants to move everything to the correct standard, but the other half (which is beginning to take over) is saying "Screw it!  Garbage in, Garbage out!".  I mean, if I start drawing to the current standard, that stuff will stick out like a sore thumb.

I'll leave it to you folks...Whaddayathink?

Slim©

  • Needs a day job
  • Posts: 6566
  • The Dude Abides...
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #1 on: August 11, 2004, 04:17:47 PM »
Personally, I would only revise, update, or redraw only the ones that are needed right now.
If you have an intern drafter, this would be a great job to help them get experience, learn your company's standards then become a valuable employee. Or you could get a junior drafter to do it, for the same reason. Great entry level work, just make sure they are well supervised.
I drink beer and I know things....

CADaver

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #2 on: August 11, 2004, 04:27:28 PM »
We've had the same CAD manager for the last 12 years... me. It's rare now to find a file in house that hasn't been brought up to current standards.  We did, though, recently have a client that was purchased by another company, as we work on legacy files we bring up to the new client's standards.

Bob Garner

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2004, 06:32:01 PM »
To me, it all comes down to:

Got Budget?

Dent Cermak

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2004, 07:15:07 PM »
I fix it, then I fire them.Works like a charm!

hendie

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #5 on: August 12, 2004, 06:25:26 AM »
I'd have to update the blue poodle, simply because it would annoy the hell out of me later in case anyone thought I was responsible for it.


and then there are days when I just don't care.

hudster

  • Gator
  • Posts: 2848
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #6 on: August 12, 2004, 07:23:38 AM »
I as CAD senior HAVE to audit every drawing being issued, if it don't comply I have to make it comply prior to issue.
Revit BDS 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, AutoCAD 2017, 2016, Navisworks 2017, 2016, BIM360 Glue

SPDCad

  • Bull Frog
  • Posts: 453
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #7 on: August 12, 2004, 09:49:40 AM »
I change the unstandardized files as I come across them. If there is a drawings or a piece of a drawing that I need to complete the current work I have.  I will take the time to update the drawing.   The new updated drawing is then saved with the old drawing name but -UPD is added to the name.  If there comes a time, and they are rare, that a whole projects has been converted over or is close to it (usually the students job to complete a update) the old drawings are archived.
    That was the standard practice at my old office which was fairly large and a general standard was in practice..
AutoCAD 2010, w/ OpenDCL

visit: http://reachme.at/spd_designs

diarmuid

  • Bull Frog
  • Posts: 417
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #8 on: August 12, 2004, 10:08:26 AM »
here is a perfect example of how an extremely elaborate lisp routine (childs play to dome of you guys) could be used to good effect.

the lisp could be made to.  identify all objects on various layers and sort them accordingly.  (sounds simple)

if you adapt the attitude on how you'd make the layers it can be done.  you wont get the drawing completly right but it will be in a dame sight better shape than before.

1. text.

select all text in model space. set the text colour to bylayer.  get the routine to create text layers in accordance with standard text heights.  get the routine to put text of various scales in to their relevent layer, and apply a "fuzz" size i.e. text that is near to the scale. or any "rogue" sizes on its own layer called "rogue_text" for example

2. Dimensions

a bit simpler.  apply the same philosphy as above.  You may want leaders to appear on their own layers. you could then, using layer merge merge those layers with their corresponding text layers.

3. Linetypes,  select eveything that is not bylayer linetype.  move them to their corresponding layer.  when they're on the layers  "hidden_lines" or what ever  make them bylayer but change the layer's linetype to hidden or what ever.  you could probably elaborate on those selection sets as well having them called "hidden_lines_nbyco" the nbyco would be the layers with the entities colour are not bylayer.

4. ploylines

5. viewports

6. titleblocks, north arrows

etc.

and so on.

there are about 30-40 different types of enities that can be placed bylayer. it would be a case of establisihing what sould be placed on what layers.  the standard hatches could go all on one layer or one for each type...BUT you then have 20 layers for 20 hatch patterns, but you can still whittle that down even more. by "hand" at a later stage.

A poorly  standardised or organzed drawing, is for the most part, poor layering.  the lisp that would be composed would be a very large undertaking.  but at the end of it all, it would be a cruise missile of a routine.

If your company uses standard blocks  it could be made to select all the block names from a standard text file( which could be updated regularly, )search for them and move them to a layer for processing. by a junior technician. get them to do it. delegate, delegate

It can be Done.  i'd have done it before but i'm no good a lisp routines etc.  i understand whats involved in bringing a drawing up to scratch , lord knows i've spent time doing it.  there is a lot of repetition involved in it.

the 2-3 weeks you take to put together a routine  it will save you years in both your own manhours and or someone elses.  it seems like a tall order but,  it is a very sound proposal.

you will end up with a drawing, that will be in a hell of a lot better shape than before, possibly even in good condition.

simpify each section, break each set up into its layer "groups"  then set about whittleing those down by "hand" you will probably find that's when you revise the "cruise_missle.lsp" (i've named it, patent pending  :lol: ) to do the whittling.

in short.  divide and conquer.

HTH

i'll put the long version up next week. :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
If you want to win something run the 100m, if you want to experience something run a marathon

Slim©

  • Needs a day job
  • Posts: 6566
  • The Dude Abides...
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #9 on: August 12, 2004, 10:46:06 AM »
Nice idea, diarmuid. I believe I can work up something like that for where I work. Although we are working on getting some updated standards in place, so it may be a short while. :)
I drink beer and I know things....

yyou

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #10 on: August 12, 2004, 01:43:15 PM »
I would fix the dwg up to standard if the dwg is small like details.
Many times we have to use details from the structural firms.

If the dwg is a large as-built or existing plan from other engineering firm.  
I just try to change the color and the font so it plots right.  The rest of it stay as is.

Keith™

  • Villiage Idiot
  • Seagull
  • Posts: 16899
  • Superior Stupidity at its best
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #11 on: August 13, 2004, 01:51:27 PM »
To me it depends entirely upon whether or  not these drawings will ever be used again.
For example, you note that some drawings are from 1982. I would hope that by now the project has been completed. In that case, I would say, leave them alone....If the drawing is one that is used regularly, and needs updating, then I would update it completely, including standards.

My point is, that if you have a drawing that is not within your current standards, but it is no longer needed except for archival purposes, forget about it, it is a losing proposition, because when standards change 5 years from now, you will still be trying to revise and update that drawing.

If the drawing is a current drawing and I find it is significantly out of compliance with standards, it must be redone, completely, not reworked, as this is where mistakes are made, but completely redone from scratch. The offending party will remember the problems and will not make the same error twice, if they do, it is the last time they make that error.
Proud provider of opinion and arrogance since November 22, 2003 at 09:35:31 am
CadJockey Militia Field Marshal

Find me on https://parler.com @kblackie

whodo

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #12 on: August 14, 2004, 12:43:30 AM »
I would fix the new parts I was working on
and leave the rest, unless you have the time and
budget then fix the whole drawing.
The problem I see for you is that you say fix but
at the time they were created they were not incorrect
only now after a lot of time has gone by and many new
cad managers are they now incorrect.
So I would have to agree that it comes down to time
and budget, got money got better drawings otherwise
your screwed.

M-dub

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #13 on: August 14, 2004, 04:15:04 PM »
Yeah, You know exactly what I'm talking about, Ron...You've had the 'pleasure' of working on lots of these 'masterpieces'.  They were all correct, or close to it, at the time they were originally drawn at, but now some of them are just a dog's breakfast.

I think for this client in particular, it's definitely time and money.  The company and the guys who are using the drawings don't give two you-know-whats about what layer / colour / etc. everything was created on...as long as they can read the drawing and that it's correct.

t-bear

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #14 on: August 14, 2004, 09:27:03 PM »
By "correct" I'm assuming that you mean you can build from it....not that it meets any kind of proper "dtandard".  If the client doesn't have any problem with it, and doesn't KNOW it's a basket case, I guess there's no sense in blowing your profit margin fixing the stupid things.....much as it may hurt your sense of pride....it's NOT your work, after all.....

Sound like a cop-out? ... maybe, but you need to draw the line somewhere......

M-dub

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #15 on: August 15, 2004, 05:42:41 PM »
Exactly.

A lot of these drawings are simple schematics and P&ID's, etc. so they're fairly simple drawings.  I mean, when I find drawings where people didn't know how to stretch or extend lines and simply add another line to the end of an existing one to make it longer, I always fix that kind of crap, but I'm not going to sit there and bring every drawing I work on up to standard.  It would just take far too long and I definitely couldn't justify it.  Like I said, as long as the engineers and maintenance crew can read it and that it's correct to what's out there in the field, they're happy.  All drawings created from scratch are drawn to the standard, but I was just kinda wondering what everyone else out there does.

daron

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #16 on: August 16, 2004, 08:33:02 AM »
I relate this topic to an experience washing dishes when I was younger. There was this pile of dishes from a party the night before that I had NOTHING to do with. For some reason it fell to my lot that I got to wash them. Being about 10 years of age and hating washing dishes as much as I do to this day, I battled against it, daydreamt of how to get out of it, got pounded on by my older brother because I wasn't doing it and eventually, after about 6 hours, getting it done. I later realized that if I had organized the pile into manageable stacks, it wouldn't have seemed so daunting and I probably could've gotten it done in half the time. I view this experience in work as well. If a drawing isn't set up correctly, (with few exceptions), it'll take longer to get it done than if I were to go through and organize it.

M-dub

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #17 on: August 19, 2004, 03:37:10 PM »
How about SNAP?!  What's your opinion of drawings not on snap (drawings that SHOULD be on snap, that is...)  Do you put them on snap?

daron

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #18 on: August 20, 2004, 09:09:39 AM »
I haven't used SNAP since school. I can understand drawing near 0,0, but on snap seems very archaic to me. We had a new guy at Pulte come in and try to show everybody the benefits of using snap. We all looked at each other and tried hard not to laugh. We told him, there are other ways that we prefer. Needless to say, he's the boss in training. That's a frightning thought. That was one of the things that finally convinced me that moving was a good idea.

M-dub

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #19 on: August 20, 2004, 09:14:29 AM »
So you see no need for snap?  What type of drafting do you do?
Creating instrument loops, electrical schematics, single line diagrams, etc. is made much easier and faster if everything is on snap.  I used to think snap was useless until I started working for an instrument / electrical engineering firm...
What are these 'other methods' you use?

Dent Cermak

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #20 on: August 20, 2004, 01:01:57 PM »
So how does one draw a line from the end point or midpoint of another line without using osnap ?? You just "eye-ball" it ? So basically, you drawing has no actual intersections? Here, you don't use osnao, we snap you home.

M-dub

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #21 on: August 20, 2004, 01:11:34 PM »
If you draw with SNAP = ON.

If the whole drawing is drawn on snap, you should only require Osnaps under special circumstances.

Of course, my reasoning for originally posting this question was due to finding many drawings that should have been drawn on snap that weren't....And yes, we find drawings done by mental midgets where they 'eye-ball' the endpoints, midpoints, etc. which angers us to no end.  In many cases, due to budget and/or timing issues, we'll fix only the areas affecting us as opposed to taking the time to basically redraw the entire thing.

For drawings not requiring snap to be on, then of course, we use Osnaps.  (By WE, I'm referring to the able-minded CADdie)

daron

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #22 on: August 20, 2004, 01:29:17 PM »
First of all Dent, just in case you've forgotten, Snap and OSnap are two different things. I hate snap as much as I do ortho. I use polar and Osnaps. To answer then the real question, "What are the other methods you use?". Besides osnap and polar, ever hear of coordinate entry. Snaps bounce you all over the place. I want a distance, I  select the point at which to draw, set a direction and type in the distance. Done. That's one example. There are more ways by using different combinations of tracking osnaps. Ever use the From osnap? That's a beauty. Tracking is too, but they've replaced it with Temp Tracking, which is not the same.

t-bear

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #23 on: August 20, 2004, 01:36:19 PM »
Snaps?  No way!  How do you use snaps in 3D?

If my tolerances/snaps are set to 1/16" and I've got a pipe run that's 36' 7 3/16" long, it's a WHOLE lot easier to use coord entry.

M-dub

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #24 on: August 20, 2004, 02:05:42 PM »
Alright, Alright...
I would have to agree with the snaps bouncing you all over the place, but in many cases (here), we actually WANT that.  Not in ALL cases, but here's an example of ONE.

I've turned the grid on to show you what I mean.  The grid is set to twice that of the snap setting.  It just makes for quick and easy...almost 'Zombie CAD' as I like to call it.  I realise that in many many other fields of drafting, snap would be of absolutely no use, but in ours, there is...

ANYWAY, (EXCUSE THE CAPS, BUT I AM YELLING) I JUST GOT A CALL FROM OUR OFFICE AND THERE'S SOMETHING ABOUT AN ALL INCLUSIVE TRIP TO FLORIDA OR CLUB MED OR SOMETHING FOR ALL EMPLOYEES!  SOMETHING ABOUT A REALLY GOOD YEAR FOR THE COMPANY OR SOMETHING.
If this is a joke, I'm going to kill!  I've gotta go anyway.  Good Ol' VB Training...Then Camping this weekend.
Have a great one, everybody.

t-bear

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #25 on: August 20, 2004, 04:09:33 PM »
Alright Mikie......



Try this with snaps on.......and this is a small, relatively uncomplicated system.......

Have a good weekend folks!

M-dub

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #26 on: August 20, 2004, 04:47:46 PM »
Ted, THAT is a good example of what NOT to use snaps on and I realised that from the beginning.  We have TONS of drawings like you've shown and snap is not used, but OSNAPs ARE.  This isn't an argument, I was just asking what you'd do in the situation where snap WAS required and it wasn't used properly...
Anyway, the thing I said about the free trip to Florida is TRUE!  See the e-mail from the boss below:

Quote
In appreciation of all our employee's efforts over the last year, Langtree would like to invite you and your spouse on a weekend retreat.
 
We plan to fly out of Detroit Airport on Friday, September 17 and return on Sunday, September 19.
 
We are planning to stay at the all inclusive Club Med Sandpiper Resort, in Port St. Lucie, Florida.
 
We need to book the trip on Monday morning, August 25.  Please confirm your attendance as soon as possible.
 
We hope everyone can attend.
 
 
Sincerely,

*the bosses*

P.S. More details will be available once we book the trip.

Have a great weekend everyone...I know I will!  :)
« Last Edit: January 11, 2007, 11:09:30 AM by M-dub »

OU-CAD

  • Guest
Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #27 on: August 24, 2004, 06:46:24 PM »
If this is a drawing that will be used over and over for other projects AND the time to make these changes wasn't going to break the drafting budget and wind up losing money, I'd take the time to fix it.  It would save time and frustration down the line and probably make the drawing appear more professional.  

If this is a one-time deal, I wouldn't bother.  The most important thing is not whether the drawing is pretty; it's whether the guy in the field can build accurately from it.

It seems that too often the "prettiness" of the drawing sometimes takes a back seat to the clarity of the construction documentation.  I catch myself being as guilty of this sometimes as the younger guys I supervise.  It's a matter of keeping in mind that time is money and if it doesn't make it clearer for the guy in the field, it's a waste of time.

M-dub

  • Guest
Re: Drawings That Have Deviated From The Standards
« Reply #28 on: January 11, 2007, 11:08:20 AM »
*bump*

Woah, didn't know this one went back to 2004!

I bumped this one because of some of the absolute garbage I'm working on right now... should we maybe start a new thread for it?  Is it even worth discussing anymore?
« Last Edit: January 11, 2007, 11:17:16 AM by M-dub »