Author Topic: Reactor or any better better idea than reactor  (Read 1394 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Tharwat

  • Swamp Rat
  • Posts: 710
  • Hypersensitive
Reactor or any better better idea than reactor
« on: March 29, 2012, 04:06:38 AM »
Hello everyone ..

When using a code to modify a block (change color , linetypes , lineweights .... etc) and we want to undo these changes we use the UNDO command , but the
we will never see the undo changes unless we regen the drawing .

So the question is , should we include a reactor within the routine for that step , or is there any better idea (than reactor) to undo the changes with regen ?

Thanks in advance  :-)

huiz

  • Swamp Rat
  • Posts: 919
  • Certified Prof C3D
Re: Reactor or any better better idea than reactor
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2012, 04:33:31 AM »
Does REGENAUTO set to ON have any effect?
The conclusion is justified that the initialization of the development of critical subsystem optimizes the probability of success to the development of the technical behavior over a given period.

Tharwat

  • Swamp Rat
  • Posts: 710
  • Hypersensitive
Re: Reactor or any better better idea than reactor
« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2012, 04:36:26 AM »
Hi huiz .

Regenauto is ON all the time in my machine . :-)

Thanks

jbuzbee

  • Swamp Rat
  • Posts: 851
Re: Reactor or any better better idea than reactor
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2012, 10:27:06 AM »
long time since I did any of this, but isn't there a regen method for the document object?  Why not just call that at the end of your routine?

jbuzbee
James Buzbee
Windows 8

BlackBox

  • King Gator
  • Posts: 3770
Re: Reactor or any better better idea than reactor
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2012, 10:50:22 AM »
Building on what's already been mentioned... you might consider incorporating the ENTUPD function.
"How we think determines what we do, and what we do determines what we get."