Author Topic: Preferred PDF platform for workflow integration  (Read 3997 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TheCADnoob

  • Newt
  • Posts: 25
Preferred PDF platform for workflow integration
« on: April 03, 2018, 08:42:40 AM »
Looking at taking on some publishing responsibilities and could use some guidance or recommendations.

What's the best PDF platform out there these days. What i'm really looking for is one that is customizable and has the ability to integrate with other systems, or at least has the ability to allow useful scripting.

I've heard good things about blue beam but I've only really used Adobe so far. I've thrown some Java at acrobat with limited success.. I've downloaded the SDK, but before I leap that far into it I figured id ask around.

To boldly go where spell check has never gone before. | AutoCAD - 2016 | cadnoob.com

JohnK

  • Administrator
  • Seagull
  • Posts: 10640
Re: Preferred PDF platform for workflow integration
« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2018, 09:10:34 AM »
Not sure I fully understand the scope of your criteria --i.e. "integrate with other systems" (what does that mean?), etc.--but Ghostscript would probably allow you the greatest script-ability, in that you can just roll C programs by including the headers. That would mean, no gui necessary and you wouldn't have to "open a pdf" to do what you want, thus save yourself the time required to load up separate PDFs each time you want to run a script (or preform an action).

If you don't know C, and would be happy with the limited features, you can try the Ghostscript .NET wrapper.
https://archive.codeplex.com/?p=ghostscriptnet
TheSwamp.org (serving the CAD community since 2003)
Member location map - Add yourself

Donate to TheSwamp.org

dgorsman

  • Water Moccasin
  • Posts: 2437
Re: Preferred PDF platform for workflow integration
« Reply #2 on: April 03, 2018, 10:01:34 AM »
We've standardized on BlueBeam.  It's got pretty much everything you could want; downside is, users need to be trained on all the functions and you'll need a couple of in-office specialists to help out when problems crop up.
If you are going to fly by the seat of your pants, expect friction burns.

try {GreatPower;}
   catch (notResponsible)
      {NextTime(PlanAhead);}
   finally
      {MasterBasics;}

ronjonp

  • Needs a day job
  • Posts: 7529
Re: Preferred PDF platform for workflow integration
« Reply #3 on: April 03, 2018, 10:32:59 AM »
Bluebeam here too.

Windows 11 x64 - AutoCAD /C3D 2023

Custom Build PC

basher76

  • Guest
Re: Preferred PDF platform for workflow integration
« Reply #4 on: April 03, 2018, 11:06:15 AM »
BlueBeam user here as well.   

For estimating takeoffs, file manipulation, etc.. it's hard to beat for the price.   

The support is good, the MSI installer works well with group policy for deployment, and the interface is fairly easy to customize to fit how you use it.   It has some glitches, but what software doesn't?


TheCADnoob

  • Newt
  • Posts: 25
Re: Preferred PDF platform for workflow integration
« Reply #5 on: April 03, 2018, 11:21:53 AM »
Not sure I fully understand the scope of your criteria --i.e. "integrate with other systems" (what does that mean?), etc.--but Ghostscript would probably allow you the greatest script-ability, in that you can just roll C programs by including the headers. That would mean, no gui necessary and you wouldn't have to "open a pdf" to do what you want, thus save yourself the time required to load up separate PDFs each time you want to run a script (or preform an action).

If you don't know C, and would be happy with the limited features, you can try the Ghostscript .NET wrapper.
https://archive.codeplex.com/?p=ghostscriptnet

Awesome! I had not even considered ghostscript. ill be sure to look into it. I've done C years ago so it might not take me much to past the hello world stage.

As far as "integrate with other systems," im still just stabbing a little bit the dark. Basically I wanting to improve processes through automation I need something flexible enough for me to allow automate things and where possible and if there is a way interface with other programs.
To boldly go where spell check has never gone before. | AutoCAD - 2016 | cadnoob.com

TheCADnoob

  • Newt
  • Posts: 25
Re: Preferred PDF platform for workflow integration
« Reply #6 on: April 03, 2018, 11:23:45 AM »
I appreciate all the feedback
To boldly go where spell check has never gone before. | AutoCAD - 2016 | cadnoob.com

MSTG007

  • Gator
  • Posts: 2601
  • I can't remeber what I already asked! I need help!
Re: Preferred PDF platform for workflow integration
« Reply #7 on: April 03, 2018, 11:48:16 AM »
Yup Bluebeam here... We publish our drawings with the DWG to PDF printer within AutoCAD then Bluebeam it out from there.
Civil3D 2020

JohnK

  • Administrator
  • Seagull
  • Posts: 10640
Re: Preferred PDF platform for workflow integration
« Reply #8 on: April 03, 2018, 12:32:51 PM »
Oh! Well bluebeam has an outlook, word, and excel plugin that makes your MS office experience that much more annoying (just like adobe).

Overall BB is nice and once you get the hang of the keyboard shortcuts you can really generate red-lines quickly. It has a very nice/clunky markup manager which can be useful. BB's interface itself is garbage but it's better then Adobe's -i.e. Bluebeam's interface is straight from the 90's and full of wasted screen space but Adobe's tools take far too many mouse clicks to get at. Overall, I like BB better then Adobe.

Foxit is also a nice PDF viewer. You can do most of the same things in Foxit as you can in Bluebeam for free and the interface is a lot like MS Word.

Sumatra PDF is my absolute favorite stand-alone viewer but it does not allow you to markup.

Also, if your looking to just view PDFs and not markup, Mozilla and Chrome now have built in PDF viewers so it makes things super simple.

Not sure I fully understand the scope of your criteria --i.e. "integrate with other systems" (what does that mean?), etc.--but Ghostscript would probably allow you the greatest script-ability, in that you can just roll C programs by including the headers. That would mean, no gui necessary and you wouldn't have to "open a pdf" to do what you want, thus save yourself the time required to load up separate PDFs each time you want to run a script (or preform an action).

If you don't know C, and would be happy with the limited features, you can try the Ghostscript .NET wrapper.
https://archive.codeplex.com/?p=ghostscriptnet

Awesome! I had not even considered ghostscript. ill be sure to look into it. I've done C years ago so it might not take me much to past the hello world stage.

As far as "integrate with other systems," im still just stabbing a little bit the dark. Basically I wanting to improve processes through automation I need something flexible enough for me to allow automate things and where possible and if there is a way interface with other programs.
TheSwamp.org (serving the CAD community since 2003)
Member location map - Add yourself

Donate to TheSwamp.org

ChrisCarlson

  • Guest
Re: Preferred PDF platform for workflow integration
« Reply #9 on: April 03, 2018, 04:30:53 PM »
Bluebeam for anything AEC related, I have yet to find another software which can handle the large format drawings as effectively.

JohnK

  • Administrator
  • Seagull
  • Posts: 10640
Re: Preferred PDF platform for workflow integration
« Reply #10 on: April 03, 2018, 05:22:17 PM »
Bluebeam for anything AEC related, I have yet to find another software which can handle the large format drawings as effectively.

I feel that design review (dwfx) does a great job (better than BB in some aspects), seeing as it was designed specifically for us (large format).
TheSwamp.org (serving the CAD community since 2003)
Member location map - Add yourself

Donate to TheSwamp.org

CAB

  • Global Moderator
  • Seagull
  • Posts: 10401
Re: Preferred PDF platform for workflow integration
« Reply #11 on: April 17, 2018, 09:27:48 AM »
Foxit PhantomPDF Standard here.
Does all I need.

I've reached the age where the happy hour is a nap. (°¿°)
Windows 10 core i7 4790k 4Ghz 32GB GTX 970
Please support this web site.