Author Topic: Civil3D - CAD Performance Specs  (Read 10691 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MSTG007

  • Gator
  • Posts: 2601
  • I can't remeber what I already asked! I need help!
Civil3D - CAD Performance Specs
« on: March 11, 2016, 08:34:12 AM »
I am looking with our IT department about computer upgrade systems with Civil3D. I wanted to get your thoughts on these two systems and what you think would be better.

Thinkstation P310 Xeon E3-1240V5 3.5 GHZ
8 GB RAM
256 GB SSD
Quadro K620


or

Thinkstation P300 Xeon E3-1241V3 3.5 GHZ
16 GB RAM
1 TB Harddrive
Quadro K620

Thanks for any feedback!
Civil3D 2020

Rob...

  • King Gator
  • Posts: 3824
  • Take a little time to stop and smell the roses.
Re: Civil3D - CAD Performance Specs
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2016, 08:39:24 AM »
You will thank yourself by going with the SSD. Upgrading the RAM would be a consideration with that machine.
CAD Tech

Mark

  • Custom Title
  • Seagull
  • Posts: 28762
Re: Civil3D - CAD Performance Specs
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2016, 08:50:48 AM »
I'm going with the Thinkstation P300. I would rather have more ram and a spinning disk.
TheSwamp.org  (serving the CAD community since 2003)

mjfarrell

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 14444
  • Every Student their own Lesson
Re: Civil3D - CAD Performance Specs
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2016, 08:56:08 AM »
second hard drive....and dedicate your swap file there...make it HUGE!
Be your Best


Michael Farrell
http://primeservicesglobal.com/

cadtag

  • Swamp Rat
  • Posts: 1152
Re: Civil3D - CAD Performance Specs
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2016, 09:19:11 AM »
Speccing a Xeon is pretty much throwing money straight down the toilet for CAD,  since there's very limited use of all the cores and features in that processor.  Running a multi-user database a Xeon is excellent.  For CAD/C3D?  nope.  And the ECC Ram Xeons require is more expensive, and not beneficial in CAD.

See the recent Ars Technica article on Intel processors for a good discussion on the modesl/features and identifiers.

And seriously -- look at Boxx and compare their offerings to Lenovo.  At least the folk at Boxx and Xi know how to spell CAD
The only thing more dangerous to the liberty of a free people than big government is big business

ronjonp

  • Needs a day job
  • Posts: 7529
Re: Civil3D - CAD Performance Specs
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2016, 09:24:32 AM »
Definitely make your primary drive an SSD.

Windows 11 x64 - AutoCAD /C3D 2023

Custom Build PC

Mark

  • Custom Title
  • Seagull
  • Posts: 28762
Re: Civil3D - CAD Performance Specs
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2016, 09:28:33 AM »
And seriously -- look at Boxx and compare their offerings to Lenovo.  At least the folk at Boxx and Xi know how to spell CAD
Cool, never heard of them. They are not inexpensive machines though. You pay for that overclocked i-7. Wow!
TheSwamp.org  (serving the CAD community since 2003)

ronjonp

  • Needs a day job
  • Posts: 7529
Re: Civil3D - CAD Performance Specs
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2016, 09:41:50 AM »
Is this really the price for the processor?


Windows 11 x64 - AutoCAD /C3D 2023

Custom Build PC

mjfarrell

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 14444
  • Every Student their own Lesson
Re: Civil3D - CAD Performance Specs
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2016, 09:44:25 AM »
@ newegg



Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 Ivy Bridge-EP 3.0 GHz LGA 2011 130W BX80635E52690V2 Server Processor Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 Ivy Bridge-EP 3.0 GHz 25MB L3 Cache LGA 2011 130W BX80635E52690V2 Server Processor
$2,064.99
Be your Best


Michael Farrell
http://primeservicesglobal.com/

ronjonp

  • Needs a day job
  • Posts: 7529
Re: Civil3D - CAD Performance Specs
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2016, 09:47:41 AM »
@ newegg



Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 Ivy Bridge-EP 3.0 GHz LGA 2011 130W BX80635E52690V2 Server Processor Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 Ivy Bridge-EP 3.0 GHz 25MB L3 Cache LGA 2011 130W BX80635E52690V2 Server Processor
$2,064.99
Dang ... my whole computer did not cost that much!
The I-7 seems like a no brainer.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2016, 09:51:57 AM by ronjonp »

Windows 11 x64 - AutoCAD /C3D 2023

Custom Build PC

MSTG007

  • Gator
  • Posts: 2601
  • I can't remeber what I already asked! I need help!
Re: Civil3D - CAD Performance Specs
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2016, 09:49:10 AM »
Wow... That's a lot.
Civil3D 2020

mjfarrell

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 14444
  • Every Student their own Lesson
Re: Civil3D - CAD Performance Specs
« Reply #11 on: March 11, 2016, 09:58:34 AM »
Wow... That's a lot.

It is also a LOT of waste until autodesk makes all their products capable of using multiple core processors, and or multiple processors.
Be your Best


Michael Farrell
http://primeservicesglobal.com/

Rob...

  • King Gator
  • Posts: 3824
  • Take a little time to stop and smell the roses.
Re: Civil3D - CAD Performance Specs
« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2016, 09:59:31 AM »
Here we go again...
CAD Tech

mjfarrell

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 14444
  • Every Student their own Lesson
Re: Civil3D - CAD Performance Specs
« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2016, 10:00:34 AM »
Here we go again...
really were you going?
Be your Best


Michael Farrell
http://primeservicesglobal.com/

mjfarrell

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 14444
  • Every Student their own Lesson
Re: Civil3D - CAD Performance Specs
« Reply #14 on: March 11, 2016, 10:02:25 AM »
Here we go again...

statement of FACTS is a problem for you?


https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/autocad/troubleshooting/caas/sfdcarticles/sfdcarticles/Support-for-multi-core-processors-with-AutoCAD.html

Quote
Due to the lack of multi-threading, AutoCAD is not capable of using more than 50% of the CPU on a dual-core computer, so there is no significant performance gain over a single CPU computer except for the areas noted above.
Be your Best


Michael Farrell
http://primeservicesglobal.com/