Author Topic: Batching and correcting standards  (Read 5639 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Draftek

  • Guest
Batching and correcting standards
« on: March 15, 2011, 10:51:46 AM »
I see the Batch Standards Checker does some checking and reporting.
Is there a tool to batch through drawings and correct drawings using some form of mapping?
I'm interested in layers, text styles, dim styles - the usual stuff.

If not, I have to build one.

Thanks

mjfarrell

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 14444
  • Every Student their own Lesson
Re: Batching and correcting standards
« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2011, 11:40:34 AM »
the batch checker will report on those issues, however it doesn't fix them


EDITED for accuracy
« Last Edit: March 15, 2011, 01:25:22 PM by Higgs Boson's Mate »
Be your Best


Michael Farrell
http://primeservicesglobal.com/

Draftek

  • Guest
Re: Batching and correcting standards
« Reply #2 on: March 15, 2011, 11:56:03 AM »
eh! that won't fly, I did a little research and much to my surprise there is nothing readily available.

There goes the next 80 hours of my working life.....

David Hall

  • Automatic Duh Generator
  • King Gator
  • Posts: 4075
Re: Batching and correcting standards
« Reply #3 on: March 15, 2011, 12:33:51 PM »
I have some code already worked up you could tweak if you want it
Everyone has a photographic memory, Some just don't have film.
They say money can't buy happiness, but it can buy Bacon and that's a close second.
Sometimes the question is more important than the answer. (Thanks Kerry for reminding me)

Draftek

  • Guest
Re: Batching and correcting standards
« Reply #4 on: March 15, 2011, 01:39:42 PM »
Thanks David I appreciate it but I'm not really allowed.

cmwade77

  • Swamp Rat
  • Posts: 1443
Re: Batching and correcting standards
« Reply #5 on: August 26, 2011, 07:48:32 PM »
Probably a little late, but there is LayTrans

Draftek

  • Guest
Re: Batching and correcting standards
« Reply #6 on: August 29, 2011, 12:15:17 PM »
Thanks, I wrote an app for them to use but as I suspected - a very dangerous thing to do so it never got implemented.

I see now why one doesn't readily exist.