Author Topic: A "223" bug in all the versions?  (Read 38922 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

highflyingbird

  • Bull Frog
  • Posts: 414
  • Later equals never.
Re: A "223" bug in all the versions?
« Reply #15 on: October 19, 2010, 10:24:13 AM »
So, it may be a problem with lists 3 or 4 elements long where the first element is  220  to-> 239.
Acutally ,I found a lot of numbers have this kind of bug.
for example, use this routine,you can find more numbers.
Code: [Select]
;;; from 5 to 32
(DEFUN C:T1 (/ n k)
  (SETQ N (GETINT "\nPlease entet a number:"))
  (setq K (+ (* N 1000) 210))                 ;can be replaced by any number of 210-239
  (list (list K 1 1))
)

0, 220~239
1, 220~239
2, 210~239
3, 210~239
4, 222~239
5, 210~239
..
32,210~239

It's really weird.it looks like irregular.
maybe it's associated with ASCII??

so many numbers ,we even didn't notice this bug before,really strange.I wonder how many this kind of numbers we didn't find?


according  a friend from http:://www.mjtd.com ,called masterlong, reported these numbers:

220~239
1220~1239
2010~2019
2210~2233
3016~3019
3210~3239
4222~4239
5011~5013,5015
5110~5119
5210~5239
6010~6019
6110~6119
6210~6239
7010~7019
7110~7119
7210~7239
8010~8019
8110~8119
8210~8239
9010~9019
9110~9119
9210~9239

And he mentioned an unusual number 5016:
command: (list 5016 1 1 1)
(5016 1 1 1)
; 错误: 出现异常: 0xC0000005 (访问冲突)     ->it's different from  "223" bug.
« Last Edit: October 19, 2010, 12:24:48 PM by highflybird »
I am a bilingualist,Chinese and Chinglish.

LE3

  • Guest
Re: A "223" bug in all the versions?
« Reply #16 on: October 19, 2010, 12:24:37 PM »
To avoid this, simple add:

Quote
(princ (list (list K 1 1))) (princ)

And do not have to wait that these guys at adesk to get it fixed any soon. :)

MP

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 17479
Re: A "223" bug in all the versions?
« Reply #17 on: September 13, 2019, 05:51:20 PM »
27166++ views.

Every day I see ppl viewing this - approaching ten year old - thread.

Itís not like this bug affects thousands of programs so Iím confused by the lure.

wth
\|// Set goal. Experiment tirelessly until
|Oo| practice has become expertise.  Loop.
|- | LinkedIn | Dropbox

Rod

  • Newt
  • Posts: 114
Re: A "223" bug in all the versions?
« Reply #18 on: September 15, 2019, 03:37:15 AM »
Never saw it until you posted and bought it to the top again under NEW
Must admit I always try to read about bugs
"All models are wrong, some models are useful" - George Box

Marc'Antonio Alessi

  • Swamp Rat
  • Posts: 1013
  • Marco
Re: A "223" bug in all the versions?
« Reply #19 on: September 16, 2019, 04:09:13 AM »
Never saw it until you posted and bought it to the top again under NEW
Must admit I always try to read about bugs
02-13-2003
https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/visual-lisp-autolisp-and-general/bad-argument-type-in-simple-list-why/td-p/838757