Author Topic: Po-ta-to vs Po-tat-o  (Read 16318 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Krushert

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 13679
  • FREE BEER Tomorrow!!
Po-ta-to vs Po-tat-o
« on: April 06, 2010, 02:07:32 PM »
Is the following statement doubling up in calling it an angle?

Quote
CONT. L4x4x.25 STEEL ANGLE
I + XI = X is true ...  ... if you change your perspective.

I no longer CAD or Model, I just hang out here picking up the empties beer cans

nivuahc

  • Guest
Re: Po-ta-to vs Po-tat-o
« Reply #1 on: April 06, 2010, 02:08:27 PM »
Is the following statement doubling up in calling it an angle?

Quote
CONT. L4x4x.25 STEEL ANGLE


Is an ATM Machine an Automatic Teller Machine Machine:wink:

Bob Wahr

  • Guest
Re: Po-ta-to vs Po-tat-o
« Reply #2 on: April 06, 2010, 03:21:19 PM »
Not only is the word Angle redundant, I think that the word steel is in this case.  IMO, it's safe to assume steel unless called out otherwise.

Kate M

  • Guest
Re: Po-ta-to vs Po-tat-o
« Reply #3 on: April 06, 2010, 03:44:23 PM »
Is the following statement doubling up in calling it an angle?

Quote
CONT. L4x4x.25 STEEL ANGLE


Is an ATM Machine an Automatic Teller Machine Machine:wink:
Sure, just like your car has ABS brakes.  :-)

M-dub

  • Guest
Re: Po-ta-to vs Po-tat-o
« Reply #4 on: April 06, 2010, 03:47:27 PM »
Similar to, but not the same as Tuna Fish.

Krushert

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 13679
  • FREE BEER Tomorrow!!
Re: Po-ta-to vs Po-tat-o
« Reply #5 on: April 06, 2010, 03:53:15 PM »
Not only is the word Angle redundant, I think that the word steel is in this case.  IMO, it's safe to assume steel unless called out otherwise.
With this crazy project, we have Steel, Stainless, Galvanized, painted steel, Steel with special trademarked coatings.  So calling out steel in this example is correct; in our crazy thinking anyway.  :|

If it gets any crazier with materials, I going to say I am back in the shipyard.  :cry:
I + XI = X is true ...  ... if you change your perspective.

I no longer CAD or Model, I just hang out here picking up the empties beer cans

deegeecees

  • Guest
Re: Po-ta-to vs Po-tat-o
« Reply #6 on: April 06, 2010, 04:07:02 PM »
L4x4x.25 STEEL

Would be correct in my office.

Bob Garner

  • Guest
Re: Po-ta-to vs Po-tat-o
« Reply #7 on: April 06, 2010, 04:13:26 PM »
AISC Sez:  L4x4x1/4

Tradition says materials should (shall) be identified in the specs, but if you are crazy with lots of materials and it clarifies the contract, go for material callouts on the drawings.  As long as someone will sign and agree to your contract, you're good to go.


t-bear

  • Guest
Re: Po-ta-to vs Po-tat-o
« Reply #8 on: April 06, 2010, 04:40:46 PM »
L4x4x.25 STEEL

Would be correct in my office.

Steel callouts here are by type...
SS=Stainless Steel
ASTM=mild Steel etc...

So what we have is.....

L4x4x1/4 SS-304L = stainless steel Angle
W10X39 ASTM-A36 = mild steel W-Beam
C10x20 ASTM-A36 = Mild steel Channel

The "L" identifies the structural designation, just like "W" stands for Wide beam or "C" means Channel...no need to repeat that.
Call out standard material types at the end of the structural identifier.....simple!
« Last Edit: April 06, 2010, 04:48:11 PM by t-bear »

LE3

  • Guest
Re: Po-ta-to vs Po-tat-o
« Reply #9 on: April 06, 2010, 05:10:44 PM »
do not know if has something to do this here...

normally in the architectural drawings you add an abbreviation or the whole word in the stairs of "UP" or "DN" and also draw an arrow pointing the run direction.

there was a PA in one of the projects jobs I worked and she put a note into the stairs:

STAIR TO GO DOWN
STAIR TO GO UP

those were notes into a 30 stories hotel building   :roll: yeah!

that was the fun part of architorture....

Bob Garner

  • Guest
Re: Po-ta-to vs Po-tat-o
« Reply #10 on: April 06, 2010, 05:22:35 PM »
Or the stair callout: an arrow with the word "heaven"

LE3

  • Guest
Re: Po-ta-to vs Po-tat-o
« Reply #11 on: April 06, 2010, 05:27:26 PM »
Or the stair callout: an arrow with the word "heaven"

He he...

Krushert

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 13679
  • FREE BEER Tomorrow!!
Re: Po-ta-to vs Po-tat-o
« Reply #12 on: April 06, 2010, 05:34:13 PM »
do not know if has something to do this here...

normally in the architectural drawings you add an abbreviation or the whole word in the stairs of "UP" or "DN" and also draw an arrow pointing the run direction.

there was a PA in one of the projects jobs I worked and she put a note into the stairs:

STAIR TO GO DOWN
STAIR TO GO UP

those were notes into a 30 stories hotel building   :roll: yeah!

that was the fun part of architorture....
Long story but we had a PITA of job super on a projects that was an almost rubber stamp from job to job.  This was the architects attempt to stop the phone calls.  He failed becuase he forgot spec material.  The job super called with will that be brass, stainless ... ... ...   :-D
I + XI = X is true ...  ... if you change your perspective.

I no longer CAD or Model, I just hang out here picking up the empties beer cans

LE3

  • Guest
Re: Po-ta-to vs Po-tat-o
« Reply #13 on: April 06, 2010, 05:39:07 PM »
wow  :-o  :lmao:
 
Long story but we had a PITA of job super on a projects that was an almost rubber stamp from job to job.  This was the architects attempt to stop the phone calls.  He failed becuase he forgot spec material.  The job super called with will that be brass, stainless ... ... ...   :-D

deegeecees

  • Guest
Re: Po-ta-to vs Po-tat-o
« Reply #14 on: April 07, 2010, 10:37:32 AM »
L4x4x.25 STEEL

Would be correct in my office.

Steel callouts here are by type...
SS=Stainless Steel
ASTM=mild Steel etc...

So what we have is.....

L4x4x1/4 SS-304L = stainless steel Angle
W10X39 ASTM-A36 = mild steel W-Beam
C10x20 ASTM-A36 = Mild steel Channel

The "L" identifies the structural designation, just like "W" stands for Wide beam or "C" means Channel...no need to repeat that.
Call out standard material types at the end of the structural identifier.....simple!

Ah yes, it's been a while since working with true structural drawings, (Patrick Engineering, Inc.). Here, the only people that see my construction drawings have no clue as to ANSI, ASTM, ISO, or any other standard drawing notation practices. So, I cater to their ignorance. It kind of scares me to think that if I ever have to go to work for someone that knows what they are doing again, I'll be lost.