Topic: Matrix3d and TransformBy help

[It's Alive!]

(Dan, is that you on the avatar?...)

No that’s  Ted Cassidy (AKA Lurch)  as “RUK” in  "Star Trek, What Are Little Girls Made Of?" (1966)

is that you in yours?

[Spike Wilbury]

es muy bueno 

Good!!!, does not crash and works just on rectangular faces solids... or cubes ones

[Spike Wilbury]

(Dan, is that you on the avatar?...)

No that’s  Ted Cassidy (AKA Lurch)  as “RUK” in  "Star Trek, What Are Little Girls Made Of?" (1966)

is that you in yours?

He he... I knew.... sorry

That old guy is me.

[Chuck Gabriel]

That old guy is me.

He's lying.  That's Wolfgang Puck.

[It's Alive!]

es muy bueno 

Good!!!, does not crash and works just on rectangular faces solids... or cubes ones

It will process any solid that has at least two edges that are perpendicular, still working on Mick’s idea

[Spike Wilbury]

That old guy is me.

He's lying.  That's Wolfgang Puck.

Dang!!!!,...... I knew it....  

[Spike Wilbury]

es muy bueno 

Good!!!, does not crash and works just on rectangular faces solids... or cubes ones

It will process any solid that has at least two edges that are perpendicular, still working on Mick’s idea

I see, I ran the tests on simple and complex cubes solids.... thanks.

I will try to continue with mine....

[Spike Wilbury]

Anyone have seen this:

http://www.geo.informatik.uni-bonn.de/software/geotoolkit/intro.htm

[Spike Wilbury]

Anyone have seen this:

http://www.geo.informatik.uni-bonn.de/software/geotoolkit/intro.htm

Also, have a look at the samples...

http://www.geo.informatik.uni-bonn.de/software/geotoolkit/libgt/index.html

[Spike Wilbury]

Hi,


Is there by any chance to upload here some 3d solid samples (complex/simple), that I can use to run tests ?


Thanks.


Below is a test to one of the solid posted here, the oriented bounding box is shown in green:

[MickD]

Try this one Luis, this is a classic case of when the wrong edge could give invalid results.

Note: the length should be perp the the I beam section.

[MickD]

This nect one's a bit contrived but we can get even stranger section cuts at times.

[Spike Wilbury]

Try this one Luis, this is a classic case of when the wrong edge could give invalid results.

Note: the length should be perp the the I beam section.

This is the result...

[MickD]

If you get the next one we may have a winner , nice work Luis!

[MickD]

No prob's, after posting the first one I realised that the measured edge was the longest edge even though the depth of the beam was greater. The thing is, when looping through the edges it won't get the height, only the length of the beam web edge which is well short of the length, that's why I posted the second one