Author Topic: Layering Systems  (Read 3824 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ronjonp

  • Needs a day job
  • Posts: 7533
Layering Systems
« Reply #15 on: June 22, 2005, 01:37:45 PM »
Keith,

So you use the lineweight by layer (lweight) setting correct?  I use polyline width (setvar 'plinewid) in the drawing. The only thing I don't like about lweight display is when you zoom out, the lines appear to get wider and wider.

I guess either or works....just depends on user preference.

Ron

Windows 11 x64 - AutoCAD /C3D 2023

Custom Build PC

Keith™

  • Villiage Idiot
  • Seagull
  • Posts: 16899
  • Superior Stupidity at its best
Layering Systems
« Reply #16 on: June 22, 2005, 02:26:57 PM »
lineweight bylayer is correct ....
Proud provider of opinion and arrogance since November 22, 2003 at 09:35:31 am
CadJockey Militia Field Marshal

Find me on https://parler.com @kblackie

BREZI

  • Guest
Layering Systems
« Reply #17 on: June 24, 2005, 05:39:45 AM »
Ours is based on BS:1192, but using the AutoDesk CISfd codes, and further amended to our specific needs for Building services.

BS:1192 is just guidlines, it is not very good, but the AUtoDesk layer are spot on, and I think are becoming industry standard!

The layer codes work for drawing numbers as well.

hudster

  • Gator
  • Posts: 2848
Layering Systems
« Reply #18 on: June 24, 2005, 06:14:37 AM »
Quote from: BREZI
Ours is based on BS:1192, but using the AutoDesk CISfd codes, and further amended to our specific needs for Building services.

BS:1192 is just guidlines, it is not very good, but the AUtoDesk layer are spot on, and I think are becoming industry standard!

The layer codes work for drawing numbers as well.


we use the same system, tweaked to suit our standards.
Revit BDS 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, AutoCAD 2017, 2016, Navisworks 2017, 2016, BIM360 Glue

BREZI

  • Guest
Layering Systems
« Reply #19 on: June 24, 2005, 06:31:27 AM »
Where do you work?

hudster

  • Gator
  • Posts: 2848
Layering Systems
« Reply #20 on: June 24, 2005, 06:35:08 AM »
Sauchiehall Street, you?
Revit BDS 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, AutoCAD 2017, 2016, Navisworks 2017, 2016, BIM360 Glue

BREZI

  • Guest
Layering Systems
« Reply #21 on: June 24, 2005, 06:45:11 AM »
Elmbank gardens, Wallace Whittle. small world. LOL!

hudster

  • Gator
  • Posts: 2848
Layering Systems
« Reply #22 on: June 24, 2005, 06:54:15 AM »
Wallace whittle, tell Wesley Tonner, Andy at Rybka says he's to get a shave.
Revit BDS 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, AutoCAD 2017, 2016, Navisworks 2017, 2016, BIM360 Glue

BREZI

  • Guest
Layering Systems
« Reply #23 on: June 24, 2005, 07:10:16 AM »
I told him! your right he needs a mega shave and a haircut!

hudster

  • Gator
  • Posts: 2848
Layering Systems
« Reply #24 on: June 24, 2005, 07:13:34 AM »
could you tell if he was standing up?
Revit BDS 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, AutoCAD 2017, 2016, Navisworks 2017, 2016, BIM360 Glue

BREZI

  • Guest
Layering Systems
« Reply #25 on: June 24, 2005, 09:02:42 AM »
Aye he is the same height as me!  :lol:

whdjr

  • Guest
Layering Systems
« Reply #26 on: June 24, 2005, 10:41:21 AM »
Quote from: ronjonp
The vertical program we use makes all the layers for us as well as sets polyline width and or linetype when needed. Anything drawn not using the normal tools is a lisp routine that takes care of the above. I've been using Keith's VBA code to ensure all viewports are created on layer viewport, xrefs on layer xref, dimensions on layer dimension....and others.

Our CTB file is setup using 8, 84, and 253 as the only colors shaded back (253 being the most shaded). All pen weights are set to .01", so if a line needs plot out fatter, the polyline width is changed.

This system seems to be fairly simple, straight forward, and "new hires" have not had much trouble grasping it.

Ron

Ron and Keith,

Can you guys give me some help  on this issue.  It's exactly the problem we are having.  ADT puts everything on it's layers so if we print with our pen settings it looks like garbage.  Any idea how to work this out?