Author Topic: Working in metric (sort of)  (Read 12026 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

CADaver

  • Guest
Re: Working in metric (sort of)
« Reply #15 on: January 26, 2009, 09:52:15 PM »
even computers are metric lol.

Kilobyte = 10^3 bytes
Megabyte = 10^6 bytes
Gigabyte = 10^9 bytes
Terrabyte = 10^12 bytes
a swing and a miss, the "metric" notation here is merely an approximation of the actual binary number   (kilobyte=1028, not 1000)

A question for those in the lands of metric, are not many things measure in centixxxx somethings??  Like engine displacement?

Alan Cullen

  • Guest
Re: Working in metric (sort of)
« Reply #16 on: January 26, 2009, 10:15:00 PM »
A question for those in the lands of metric, are not many things measure in centixxxx somethings??  Like engine displacement?

Possibly, I have heard of cu.cm before, but here in Australia, most engine sizes are in litres. Mine is a 3.6 Lt V6.

CADaver

  • Guest
Re: Working in metric (sort of)
« Reply #17 on: January 26, 2009, 10:16:00 PM »
A question for those in the lands of metric, are not many things measure in centixxxx somethings??  Like engine displacement?

Possibly, I have heard of cu.cm before, but here in Australia, most engine sizes are in litres. Mine is a 3.6 Lt V6.
Even cycles??

Strucmad

  • Guest
Re: Working in metric (sort of)
« Reply #18 on: January 26, 2009, 10:28:59 PM »
even computers are metric lol.

Kilobyte = 10^3 bytes
Megabyte = 10^6 bytes
Gigabyte = 10^9 bytes
Terrabyte = 10^12 bytes
a swing and a miss, the "metric" notation here is merely an approximation of the actual binary number   (kilobyte=1028, not 1000)

A question for those in the lands of metric, are not many things measure in centixxxx somethings??  Like engine displacement?

 :lmao:  Your on the ball Cadaver... I was waiting for someone to pick me up on that   :lmao:

Glad to see you back mate....

Yeah bikes are measured in cc 250, 500 1000..

kdub_nz

  • Mesozoic keyThumper
  • SuperMod
  • Water Moccasin
  • Posts: 2141
  • class keyThumper<T>:ILazy<T>
Re: Working in metric (sort of)
« Reply #19 on: January 27, 2009, 12:13:30 AM »
even computers are metric lol.

Kilobyte = 10^3 bytes
Megabyte = 10^6 bytes
Gigabyte = 10^9 bytes
Terrabyte = 10^12 bytes
a swing and a miss, the "metric" notation here is merely an approximation of the actual binary number   (kilobyte=1028, not 1000)

A question for those in the lands of metric, are not many things measure in centixxxx somethings??  Like engine displacement?

Actually, since we're nitpicking,  a kilobyte is 1,024 bytes not 1028 :)
Called Kerry in my other life
Retired; but they dragged me back in !

I live at UTC + 13.00

---
some people complain about loading the dishwasher.
Sometimes the question is more important than the answer.

Kerry

  • Mesozoic relic
  • Seagull
  • Posts: 11654
  • class keyThumper<T>:ILazy<T>
Re: Working in metric (sort of)
« Reply #20 on: January 27, 2009, 04:42:12 AM »

reminded me of this (recent)  : Converting to Metric

Some helpful tables and reference points

http://xkcd.com/526/
kdub, kdub_nz in other timelines.
Perfection is not optional.
Everything will work just as you expect it to, unless your expectations are incorrect.
Discipline: None at all.

Willie

  • Swamp Rat
  • Posts: 958
  • Going nowhere slowly
Re: Working in metric (sort of)
« Reply #21 on: January 27, 2009, 05:37:28 AM »
If you can count to ten, you can use metric units... :-D
Soli Deo Gloria | Qui Audet Adipiscitur
Windows 8  64-bit Enterprise | Civil 3D 2015 and 2016| ArcGIS 10.1
Yogi Berra : "I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous."

Matt__W

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 12955
  • I like my water diluted.
Re: Working in metric (sort of)
« Reply #22 on: January 27, 2009, 08:09:33 AM »
MJ whoever put Centimetres in that table should be shot....There is no such thing, and they should never be spoken about.. :lol: :wink: :lmao:

that would be courtesy of our friends at autodesk
The same folks who have LIGHT YEARS as an option for insertion scale.   :lol:
Autodesk Expert Elite
Revit Subject Matter Expert (SME)
Owner/FAA sUAS Pilot @ http://skyviz.io

Matt__W

  • Seagull
  • Posts: 12955
  • I like my water diluted.
Re: Working in metric (sort of)
« Reply #23 on: January 27, 2009, 08:14:01 AM »
Have been a loooooooooooooooooooong time that I stop doing drafting in metric (metros).... maybe this might help you:



Thanks!  Just what I needed.
Autodesk Expert Elite
Revit Subject Matter Expert (SME)
Owner/FAA sUAS Pilot @ http://skyviz.io

Daniel J. Ellis

  • Swamp Rat
  • Posts: 811
Re: Working in metric (sort of)
« Reply #24 on: January 27, 2009, 08:30:53 AM »
Our European friends use centimeters for architectural/engineering/etc. work, that's probably why Autodesk included them.

dJE

MJ whoever put Centimetres in that table should be shot....There is no such thing, and they should never be spoken about.. :lol: :wink: :lmao:

that would be courtesy of our friends at autodesk
===
dJE

dgorsman

  • Water Moccasin
  • Posts: 2437
Re: Working in metric (sort of)
« Reply #25 on: January 27, 2009, 02:12:49 PM »
even computers are metric lol.

Kilobyte = 10^3 bytes
Megabyte = 10^6 bytes
Gigabyte = 10^9 bytes
Terrabyte = 10^12 bytes
a swing and a miss, the "metric" notation here is merely an approximation of the actual binary number   (kilobyte=1028, not 1000)

A question for those in the lands of metric, are not many things measure in centixxxx somethings??  Like engine displacement?

Its used in some scientific calculations in some circles, aka the "cgs" system of units: centimeters/grams/seconds.  I think the "dynes" unit of measurement is based on cm rather than meters, but I could be off on that.  High school was a loooong time ago.
If you are going to fly by the seat of your pants, expect friction burns.

try {GreatPower;}
   catch (notResponsible)
      {NextTime(PlanAhead);}
   finally
      {MasterBasics;}

CADaver

  • Guest
Re: Working in metric (sort of)
« Reply #26 on: January 27, 2009, 11:10:28 PM »
even computers are metric lol.

Kilobyte = 10^3 bytes
Megabyte = 10^6 bytes
Gigabyte = 10^9 bytes
Terrabyte = 10^12 bytes
a swing and a miss, the "metric" notation here is merely an approximation of the actual binary number   (kilobyte=1028, not 1000)

A question for those in the lands of metric, are not many things measure in centixxxx somethings??  Like engine displacement?

Actually, since we're nitpicking,  a kilobyte is 1,024 bytes not 1028 :)
Crud, you're right.  Bit o' trivia though, this being a CAD site and all, anyone care to guess where my brain errantly picked up the 1028??

CADaver

  • Guest
Re: Working in metric (sort of)
« Reply #27 on: January 27, 2009, 11:13:03 PM »
If you can count to ten, you can use metric units... :-D
Look at yer fingers, even God thinks in metric.

... after thinkin' about the folks who post here, I'll re-phrase ... "Look at the fingers of NORMAL people ..."

Tuoni

  • Gator
  • Posts: 3032
  • I do stuff, and things!
Re: Working in metric (sort of)
« Reply #28 on: January 27, 2009, 11:15:14 PM »
Our European friends use centimeters for architectural/engineering/etc. work, that's probably why Autodesk included them.

dJE

MJ whoever put Centimetres in that table should be shot....There is no such thing, and they should never be spoken about.. :lol: :wink: :lmao:

that would be courtesy of our friends at autodesk
Not any engineer that I know, nor one that was trained by my family....

The SI units in metric are mm and m; cm are a lazy-man invention which has no place in measurements.

Tuoni

  • Gator
  • Posts: 3032
  • I do stuff, and things!
Re: Working in metric (sort of)
« Reply #29 on: January 27, 2009, 11:18:08 PM »
If you can count to ten, you can use metric units... :-D
Look at yer fingers, even God thinks in metric.

... after thinkin' about the folks who post here, I'll re-phrase ... "Look at the fingers of NORMAL people ..."
Meeeeowwww...

I guess you've missed the trollin', huh?