Yes, I do realize the `idiot comment' was sarcasm.
***
Note: Please do not be confused by my statements; this thread isn't necessarily bad (There are useful posts and statements in this thread). My comment was meant to put any *potential* no-so-useful threads in this conversation in check (stop where I think this thread could lead) and to place my comment on those type of replies (yes, I see the irony; it is intentional). My goal was offer up a dose of some good *OLD* theSwamp values (Is that my job, no but, if you dont like it, you don't have to listen).
No, my statement was not a `all about me' kinda thing (I'm sorry if [you] feel that way...now I have another scorecard). Its how people seem to perceive code/ideas and how they react to them.
Short/blunt version:
[We] were not involved in the planning, design and execution phases of this project so why are [you] voicing opinions about the delivery method (Keep "painting the bike-shed" and see where it gets [you]).
If you are truly interested in the product but do not feel the "delivery method" is to your liking, ask for another. If you are not interested in the product...then what do you care?