Author Topic: Lisp existance  (Read 1403 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mbrandt5

  • Newt
  • Posts: 44
Lisp existance
« on: October 26, 2017, 05:09:00 PM »
https://www.theswamp.org/index.php?topic=53564.0;topicseen

The above post questions vectorization of raster files.


Does anyone know of a lisp that takes lines within a certain distance of each other and  either mesh them into one or apply an mline of that size over the lines.

Example attached

lamarn

  • Swamp Rat
  • Posts: 636
Re: Lisp existance
« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2017, 05:13:40 PM »
I think it would be quite impossible to programm something that comes with desired output.
How does the computer know wehre to stop? what area can you define to do the merging?
Design is something you should do with both hands. My 2d hand , my 3d hand ..

lamarn

  • Swamp Rat
  • Posts: 636
Design is something you should do with both hands. My 2d hand , my 3d hand ..

mbrandt5

  • Newt
  • Posts: 44
Re: Lisp existance
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2017, 05:45:28 PM »
Definitely not impossible, one could define so much background can't be visible to consider it a line...

One could say it could be done by defining  so much x or y needing to be filled in in order to consider it a line...

don't get me wrong I'm not saying it would be easy but definitely not impossible

dgorsman

  • Water Moccasin
  • Posts: 2437
Re: Lisp existance
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2017, 07:24:19 PM »
Quickly throwing this out there, but doesn't OVERKILL already handle this?
If you are going to fly by the seat of your pants, expect friction burns.

try {GreatPower;}
   catch (notResponsible)
      {NextTime(PlanAhead);}
   finally
      {MasterBasics;}

mbrandt5

  • Newt
  • Posts: 44
Re: Lisp existance
« Reply #5 on: October 27, 2017, 10:52:09 AM »
Overkills function is to try its best to eliminate duplicates

The function I am looking for is the have selected objects the slightly represent they flow in the same direction turn into a solid line or mline based on a percentage of objects in the set only being a certain distances apart than disregarding objects out of that percentage...

For automatic wall creation based upon closest presumed size.

Though looking at overkill again that could possibly be helpful
« Last Edit: October 27, 2017, 11:06:11 AM by mbrandt5 »