Chad Wanless tried this years ago.
It was (IMO) a dismal failure, not because of any lack of programming talent, but because of the fundamental disparity between a functional programming language, such as LISP, and an imperative language, such as C++.
A "simple minded" LISP->C++ translator will restrict you to writing "simple minded" LISP programs, which defeats the purpose of using LISP.
Those few individuals with the sophisticated knowledge required to translate a moderately complex LISP program (any flavor, AutoLISP or otherwise) to an efficient C++ program are unlikely to waste their talents doing so, IMO.