I typically do a systematic review:
1. check layout for logical flow, and all plan, elevation, section and detail call outs for errors, scales correct, titles, etc.
2. check specifically for dimension and annotation errors and consistency.
3. check for construction, buildability, and value engineering opportunities.
4. last look over for extraneous errors or omissions.
That is four quick reviews through a drawing set. Most of the time is spent on #3.
Kinda depends on your work flow and industry I suppose...