@ Lee:
Why the use of vl-catch-all-apply? Are there numbers where rtos will error out?
My original thought process (before adding the
if statement to account for approximate integers) was to ensure that
DIMZIN was reset no matter the outcome of the
rtos call, and so I [lazily] wrapped the expression in a
vl-catch-all-apply; but since
rtos is now called within the test expression for the
if statement (and so would error on an invalid argument before
DIMZIN is modified), I agree that the
vl-catch-all-apply is no longer required - thanks.